September 6, 2022

Should You Give Up Carbs?

This article will help you answer the question if carbs are actually bad for your diet. Find out what they are, what they do, and how to use them.

are carbs bad for you

Should You Give Up Carbs?


How many carbs should you eat in a day? Is it bad to eat carbs if you want to lose weight?


These are questions that many people struggle with when trying to make healthy changes to their diet.


In this post, we'll explore the role of carbohydrates in nutrition and weight loss and we’ll also provide some tips for how to include them in your diet without sabotaging your goals.


So, do you need to give up carbs altogether if you want to lose weight? The answer may surprise some of you.


Read on to learn more.


What Are Carbohydrates?


Simply put, carbohydrates are nutrients found in food that the body breaks down into glucose, which is then used for energy.


 There are two main types of carbohydrates - Complex carbohydrates, which are found in starchy foods like potatoes and rice, and simple carbohydrates, which are found in sugary foods like candy.


The difference?


Well, when we eat complex carbs, they're slowly broken down into glucose and released into our bloodstream over time.


This provides a steady source of energy that helps us fuel our daily and training activities.


Simple carbs, on the other hand, are rapidly broken down and provide a quick burst of energy that can be helpful at times, but is generally not suitable for people to consume all the time.


This is because simple carbohydrates can lead to rapid spikes and drops in blood sugar.


Weight Loss & Carbohydrates


Carbohydrates have gotten a bad rap in recent years, but in fact, they are not as bad as many people believe them to be.


If you're trying to lose weight, you might have heard that cutting carbs is the key to success.


But the truth is whether or not you lose weight depends on whether or not you're in a caloric deficit.


In other words, if you're eating fewer calories than you're burning, you'll lose weight regardless of how many carbs you're eating.


Nevertheless, keep in mind that out of all 3 nutrients (protein, fats, and carbs) carbs are the best to reduce, in the context of creating a caloric deficit.


This is because carbohydrates are nonessential for the body, and are less important than protein and fats.


Still…that does not mean you have to cut carbohydrates altogether!


The vast majority of people will do great by just reducing them and making them a functional part of their nutrition plan.


Making Carbohydrates Functional!


In case you haven't heard, carbs are back!


Well, they never really left, but after years of lowcarb diets being all the rage, carbs are finally getting the recognition they deserve.


And rightfully so - carbs are an excellent source of energy for high-intensity performance, especially when compared to fats.


This is simply because glycogen (stored glucose) can be broken down into energy much more rapidly than fat.


And so, whether you're trying to up your game in the gym or simply want to be able to power through your workouts with ease, making carbs a functional part of your diet is a must.


Choose Good Carbohydrates Now, saying all of this doesn’t mean you should stack up on cake and candy!


Instead, your best bet would be to mostly rely on complex carbohydrates, such as potatoes, sweet potatoes, oats, fruits, and starchy vegetables.


These are the foods that will provide steady, consistent energy for the body.


If there are any simple carb-rich junk foods that you like, I would recommend consuming them after a workout, when the body needs energy immediately.


But again…if your goal is weight/fat loss, you want to make sure you’re not going over your allotted calorie deficit for the day.


The Verdict


And so, what’s the verdict? Are carbs bad for you or not?


The answer is a little more complicated than a simple yes or no. There are definitely benefits to limiting your carbohydrate intake (such as making it easier to create a deficit), but going completely carb-free may not be the healthiest option for everyone.


Much like anything else, your best bet would be to not go to extremes - keep it balanced.

Two men are standing next to a medicine ball in a gym.
June 6, 2025
Discover how five common training habits limit progress—and what to do instead. Coach Jim, a leading personal trainer in Nashville, shares expert insights for smarter fitness results.
A man and a woman are sitting on a bench in a gym talking to each other.
May 2, 2025
A Guide from a Personal Trainer in Nashville Functional training originally focused on improving real-life movement patterns like lifting, climbing, and carrying. Today, however, the term is often misused. In this guide, Coach Jim—a leading personal trainer in Nashville —breaks down what functional training really means, clears up common myths, and shows you how to build workouts that truly improve strength, mobility, and everyday performance. The Real Origins of Functional Training Functional training started in rehabilitation settings. Physical therapists needed to help patients regain the ability to perform daily tasks—getting up from chairs, climbing stairs, carrying groceries—safely and independently. From there, the concept moved into strength and conditioning , especially for athletes. Coaches began designing programs that mimicked the movements, speeds, and forces encountered in sport, believing that exercises should reflect the demands athletes face outside the gym. It made sense: real-world movement is multi-planar, integrated, and often performed under load or fatigue. Training that mirrors those challenges better prepares people for life outside the gym—a philosophy I bring to my personal training Nashville programs. Where It Went Wrong Fast forward to today, and "functional training" is so watered down it’s almost meaningless. You'll hear it attached to bootcamps, TikTok trends, and group fitness classes that may or may not have any real connection to improving real-life function . Here’s the problem: ➔ Functional for whom? ➔ Functional for what purpose? A competitive powerlifter needs a different kind of "functional" than a 70-year-old wanting to garden pain-free. A baseball pitcher needs different movement skills than a new mom recovering from back pain. Without context, "functional training" becomes vague, subjective, and often misleading—even for people searching for fitness training in Nashville today. Principles Over Buzzwords Rather than asking is this functional training?, it’s better to ask: Does this follow good training principles? Here’s what matters: Specificity: Does it target the movement patterns, energy systems, and qualities the person needs? Transferability: Will the adaptations carry over to real-world tasks, sports, or injury resilience? Progressive Overload: Is it challenging enough to promote strength and adaptation over time? Movement Quality: Does it reinforce good mechanics, posture, and control? Individualization: Is it tailored to the person’s needs, abilities, and goals? If a program checks these boxes, it's functional —no matter what it’s called. This is the exact approach I use with my Nashville personal training clients —focusing on principles that deliver real-world results, not gimmicks. Common Misconceptions About Functional Training Let’s clear up a few myths that still float around: Myth #1: Machines aren’t functional. Machines can be incredibly useful, especially for early rehab or hypertrophy-focused phases. They allow targeted loading without high stability demands—which can support real-world function depending on how they’re used. Myth #2: More instability = more function. Training on BOSU balls and wobble boards has its place (think ankle rehab or proprioception drills). But constantly destabilizing exercises? Not necessary. Most life (and sports) happens on stable ground. Stable surfaces allow better loading, strength gains, and neuromuscular coordination—what I emphasize in all my personal training Nashville TN programs. Myth #3: Functional training avoids heavy lifting. Quite the opposite. Functional training often involves lifting heavy—because strength matters for almost everyone. Farmers need grip strength. Athletes need power. Older adults need the ability to carry groceries or get off the floor. Load isn’t the problem. Poor application is. So, Should We Keep the Term "Functional Training"? The term can still have value—if it's clearly defined and applied correctly. At its best, it reminds us that training should serve a purpose beyond just aesthetics. It emphasizes integrated movement patterns, core control, joint stability, and real-world carryover—principles central to Nashville fitness training done the right way. But without that context? It's just another buzzword. The smarter move: Zoom in on function for the individual. A mother managing back pain needs different patterns than a CrossFitter chasing PRs. A retiree rehabbing a knee needs different strength work than a semi-pro athlete. Good training doesn’t chase trends. It meets the person where they are—and builds from there. Final Thoughts Functional training started with a powerful goal: ➔ Help people move better , live better , and perform better . But over time, its meaning has been blurred by trends, marketing, and misapplication. Today, smart training isn’t about chasing trends. It's about asking better questions: Is this training functional for the client’s real-world needs? 
A man is sitting on a bench in a gym holding a dumbbell.
April 1, 2025
Avoid Side-Eyes and Silent Judgments with These Essential Etiquette Tips
More Posts